From chapter 4: > So if we had to read the above decrement, omitting the spaces (which only a real purist would pronounce), we’d say: “luslus dec sigfas cen de

From chapter 4: > So if we had to read the above decrement, omitting the spaces (which only a real purist would pronounce), we’d say: “luslus dec sigfas cen dec bartis a tis pat sigbar soq dec soq ketcab pat wutgal tis pel zero a per tislus b tis pat barhep wutcol tis pel a lus pel b per per b buc pel b lus pel b per per.” Kabbalist? This sounds more Holy Roller to me. I plan to spend at least some of the upcoming weekend with Urbit. It should be interesting, to say the least.