3 ms·
For a first guess, if there were 5 writing dbs, each could write every 5th id, starting at a different index (0,1,2,3,4). You'd end up with globally unique ids
by hugothefrog 17y ago
For a first guess, if there were 5 writing dbs, each could write every 5th id, starting at a different index (0,1,2,3,4).
You'd end up with globally unique ids, and as long as your writes were (approx.) evenly distributed, all 5 sequences would be (approx.) close to each other.
Who knows, they might have 100 writable dbs, with only 70% up at any point in time, meaning only 70% of all integers are actually used.. anyway, I don't know, I can just imagine them doing something like this if they wanted certain things from the system.
- hboon 17y agoNo. Because their API exposes an explicit ordering of the IDs - there is a sinceID: parameter.