I guess using Occam's razor doesn't apply to this case. Because a lot of people seem to be in complete denial about this whole thing. What's most likely? That

I guess using Occam's razor doesn't apply to this case. Because a lot of people seem to be in complete denial about this whole thing. What's most likely? That he in fact was running the Silk Road and did do these deeds that we see provided as evidence to a court system, or that it was all made up and it's just "too neat", and it was all a grand conspiracy to frame this guy?