It's not quite as spectacular as it sounds[1]. I've not read the paper, but it seems as if they've just found a convenient way to describe supermultiplets in 1

It's not quite as spectacular as it sounds[1]. I've not read the paper, but it seems as if they've just found a convenient way to describe supermultiplets in 1D using doubly even codes[2]. [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.4124 http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.4124 [2] http://planetmath.org/evencode http://planetmath.org/evencode