4 ms·
There's OCR systems which work on the basis of internal font consistency. They break the page into a series of single character images, and because the same cha
by ig1 13y ago
There's OCR systems which work on the basis of internal font consistency. They break the page into a series of single character images, and because the same character repeated is close to identical it's trivial to match them up, so you can easily build a map of characters.
You then just need a human to label each character once. With a pixel image comparison 0 looks completely different from o.
If they're using a standard font then a regular OCR (you'd only need four nines accuracy to get it 100% correct) would be fine, even with a weird font it still be easy to get that level of accuracy.
- shabble 13y agoThe obvious solution to this would be to cycle randomly between fonts every few characters (or keep a running total of the font used for each particular symbol, and ensure it stays below some threshold). For bonus points you could convert the key from base64/ascii to unicode or similar.
- jloughry 13y agoThe obvious solution to this would be to cycle randomly between fonts every few characters (or keep a running total of the font used for each particular symbol, and ensure it stays below some threshold). This sounds like a useful defence in general against OCR re-use of particular things you might publish. I wonder if it could be done in a manner unobtrusive to the eye, but progressively more expensive to algorithms, either in terms of memory or time. This is really a neat idea you have.
- LinaLauneBaer 13y agoIn some fonts a big i and a small L look the same.