3 ms·
Just because you have shorter methods does not mean you would not benefit from Emacs-like power. I use Haskell--which has even shorter functions, often half tha
by tikhonj 13y ago
Just because you have shorter methods does not mean you would not benefit from Emacs-like power. I use Haskell--which has even shorter functions, often half that length--and yet I still find Emacs exceptionally useful.
Any amount of text is still text, and Emacs excels at text editing.