Unfortunately you're wrong on at least two counts: 1 - DPR can easily be implicated in every trade that took place on SR by virtue of the commission I presume

Unfortunately you're wrong on at least two counts: 1 - DPR can easily be implicated in every trade that took place on SR by virtue of the commission I presume was taken. After all if there was none, where did this income of his come from? 3 - Bitcoins are money, in the US and several other countries now: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/08/federal-judge-bitcoin-a-currency-can-be-regulated-under-american-law/ http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/08/federal-judge-bit... Regarding point 2, that's a very specific charge - my guess would be you'll see there's some very specific evidence behind it when it goes to trial.