3 ms·

Part of the rage problem is that last year's upgrade from 2G to 3G was at the lowest cost for two years starting at purchase date. This year such an offer is no

by ROFISH 17y ago

Part of the rage problem is that last year's upgrade from 2G to 3G was at the lowest cost for two years starting at purchase date. This year such an offer is not offered. Is it legal? Yes. Historically Consistent? No.

tsg 17y ago
Well, yes - but that was clearly rather different, as the 2G wasn't subsidised, and indeed didn't require a contract at purchase. This seems to be consistent with all other upgrades from subsidised phones ever, so I'd say it is historically consistent.