5 ms·
Looks like that number is in base-36 instead of base-10 (decimal). Using http://www.unitconversion.org/numbers/base-10-to-base-36-conversion.html http://www.uni
by jnord 13y ago
Looks like that number is in base-36 instead of base-10 (decimal). Using http://www.unitconversion.org/numbers/base-10-to-base-36-conversion.html http://www.unitconversion.org/numbers/base-10-to-base-36-con... yields number 80113871 as the last 8 digits of the phone number.
- aaronpk 13y agoLooks like you are smart enough to work at a startup!
- gooderlooking 13y agoYou too can be like Zuckerberg, by becoming employee #336 at a company rebranded in 2009 as a startup!
- vjeux 13y agoYou can also type the following in your JS console :) parseInt('1bp49b', 36) "The only problem is it's so tough, no one has managed to crack it yet." is very silly
- yeah_ok 13y agoI agree, "The only problem is it's so tough, no one has managed to crack it yet" is a very silly comment. Anyone who's done high school computing can probably figure this one out :(
- jdoconnor 13y agoin ruby '1bp49b'.to_i(36)
- Patrick_Devine 13y agoI'd be remiss without mentioning it in python: int('1bp49b', 36)
- damncabbage 13y agoIn poster form: http://www.flickr.com/photos/craftydogma/6657220791/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/craftydogma/6657220791/
- ajtaylor 13y agoThat was my first thought as well. Please don't tell me no one in Sydney managed to think of this.