3 ms·
Yeah, but he didn't clarify what he actually meant by invoking the MLK quote. As I said, it was a disposable invocation of a historical quote. I've read every
by thrownaway2424 13y ago
Yeah, but he didn't clarify what he actually meant by invoking the MLK quote. As I said, it was a disposable invocation of a historical quote.
I've read every comment in this thread and I don't see anybody making even a semi-cogent argument about how due process was violated in this case. Remember, the US Constitution does not guarantee your privacy. It guarantees that you won't be deprived of it without due process of law. That process appears to have been followed here, by the government at least. People like the Lavabit founder who refuse to comply with the results of due process are as guilty of undermining our system of laws as any corrupt law enforcement agency.
- jlgreco 13y agoHe could not have possibly given you a more exact and clear response to your request for clarification. I was previously giving you the benefit of the doubt and leaving myself open to the possibility that you simply had not seen it (since it is technically in response to himself) but if you really did read his response, then continued to misrepresent his comment that way, then you are doing nothing but shitposting.