4 ms·
I was told their Apache's error pages leaked "too much information", including the server's IP address. Maybe no breach was needed if this is true.
by stelonix 13y ago
I was told their Apache's error pages leaked "too much information", including the server's IP address. Maybe no breach was needed if this is true.
- csmatt 13y agoI'm not super familiar with this case or the ATT vs weev one, but I thought I read that the prosecution in the weev trial made the argument that accessing information in the open, like that of server logs is hacking? If that precedent was set, wouldn't that have an effect on when a warrant is required or no? Just curious
- jfoutz 13y agoNo. A warrant means you can do extra special stuff, like search someone's house. With a warrant, you can search for whatever you like, however you like.
- dsl 13y agoTold by who?
- uxp 13y agoThe FBI Complaint, for one. ... I know that, on May 24, 2013, a Silk Road user sent him a private message warning him that "some sort of external IP address" was "leaking" from the site, and listed the IP address of the VPN Server. The Footnote labeled 4, bottom of page 28. http://www1.icsi.berkeley.edu/~nweaver/UlbrichtCriminalComplaint.pdf http://www1.icsi.berkeley.edu/~nweaver/UlbrichtCriminalCompl... edit and off-topic rant: I really hate searching government PDFs.