Well, while applications that utilize UDP may not be "DRY;" I don't see how UDP is not DRY. Although, I think using "DRY" in this context sort of misses the po

Well, while applications that utilize UDP may not be "DRY;" I don't see how UDP is not DRY. Although, I think using "DRY" in this context sort of misses the point. It's not just that we don't want to repeat code because it's sort of inefficient but it is hard to maintain as that fixing a bug in code block C requires making that fix in its repeat code block C'. But I agree, the article is sort of odd.