3 ms·
In this current age, its more likely that the NSA is behind it. We are at a point where we need evidence that the NSA didn't help.
by Larrikin 13y ago
In this current age, its more likely that the NSA is behind it. We are at a point where we need evidence that the NSA didn't help.
- dubfan 13y agoThen at that point you are no better than 9/11 truthers and moon landing hoaxers.
- Larrikin 13y agoTheres no basis in reality for 9/11 truthers and moon landing hoaxers though
- fivethree 13y agoThat's the point.
- intslack 13y agoDenying reality isn't healthy: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/08/dea-and-nsa-team-intelligence-laundering https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/08/dea-and-nsa-team-intel... http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/05/us-dea-sod-idUSBRE97409R20130805 http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/05/us-dea-sod-idUSBRE...
- fivethree 13y agoDelusions of Grandeur aren't either.
- zero_intp 13y agoI see what you did there, Mr NSA. No seriously, the whole parallel construction dialogue for NSA feeding DEA tips is exactly the situation suggested here. Why do you equate published journalism with hoaxes and factually devoid crazies. It is insulting to a fairly civil discussion.
- arjie 13y agoAh, so the NSA's spying does have positive effects. It helped capture a drug king-pin who hires hitmen. I'd believed that dragnet capture of Internet traffic presents problems in trying to isolate relevant evidence, but you claim that this is not an issue. This certainly bolsters the claim that the NSA's surveillance is doing society good. I'm not comfortable with that, but there it is.
- mikeryan 13y agoWe are at a point where we need evidence that the NSA didn't help. So we now have to prove a negative or the NSA did it? Logic has officially left the building.