This is a Backend as a service for Content management. Its basically Salesforce for "Content Management", which isn't a bad idea. However, for my two cents: The

This is a Backend as a service for Content management. Its basically Salesforce for "Content Management", which isn't a bad idea. However, for my two cents: The documentation is lacking and as a potential customer I don't quite know enough information about the product to make an informed decision to say yes/no (on spending money on it). I had this same idea a while back (except not content, mainly blogging as a hosted web service), and didn't chose to pursue it. I do believe that there may be a market, and god knows word press can use some competition. God speed and good luck! Oh and just at a final glance, the API Documentation can be cleaner.