3 ms·
Why not? It worked for PulseAudio, right? Or how about the upgrade between the last two LTS releases? I can't understand Canonical's downright eagerness to f
by Steltek 13y ago
Why not? It worked for PulseAudio, right? Or how about the upgrade between the last two LTS releases?
I can't understand Canonical's downright eagerness to force broken software out the door just to appease their roadmap and rigid release schedule. It's pushed as the newbie friendly distro but behaves more like Gentoo when it's time to upgrade.
I cringe when I see people installing Ubuntu on to production servers. The track record just does not support that choice.
- Jach 13y agoI'm not sure why you're throwing Gentoo under the bus when its upgrade system is completely different. There is no "time to upgrade" because there are no releases to upgrade to -- you just install new versions of the software you happen to use when they come out and you feel like it. My own experiences with keeping my Gentoo systems up-to-date have been considerably more enjoyable than keeping my Ubuntu systems up-to-date. (I can no longer keep my GUI-reliant Ubuntu systems up-to-date because they're still using 10.04 as I refuse to "upgrade" past Gnome2. So it was bye-bye Ubuntu for me for new installs.) I agree with jcastro that Ubuntu Server is good, it's easy. It's a popular choice for Amazon ec2 images. It also represents a different mindset in system administration compared to the classic one that went like "Install CentOS version X and keep it for 5 years, sure the software is old as crap even when version X just came out and we hope we can apply security patches without needing a whole new version that depends on something the package manager can't provide, but it's stable!!!" (Just for fun I googled "centos packages old as crap" and this popped up as the first link. http://scalability.org/?p=6270 http://scalability.org/?p=6270 Notice how it's from two months ago? It's not a new phenomenon either.)
- jcastro 13y ago> I cringe when I see people installing Ubuntu on to production servers. The track record just does not support that choice. Wow seriously? Wikipedia, Dropbox, Hulu, NTT, ATT, HP Cloud (Guest AND Host), Comcast. Netflix is moving it's entire infrastructure to Ubuntu. Hate on linux sound all you want but Ubuntu Server is awesome.
- keithpeter 13y ago"I cringe when I see people installing Ubuntu on to production servers. The track record just does not support that choice." I would appreciate a pointer to the track record. Genuinely interested not provoking here. Ubuntu Server LTS has always had a 5 year support period, so 10.04 supported until April 2015 and 12.04 until April 2017. Seems widely used.
- SkyMarshal 13y agoI have zero problem with Canonical taking risks with their non-LTS desktop releases. That's what they've always been for. If you can't abide the issues you'll run into and don't want to contribute to the bug hunting, stick with the LTS desktop or LTS server, that's what they're for. This is a free OS, hence "customers" are also beta testers. Getting new features into their customers/testers hands early and in imperfect condition is the best way to push things forward to the next stable LTS. Learn it, live it, love it.