3 ms·
So we "simply can't know" whether the title should be taken at face value, but at the same time the parent's point is a "useless nitpick" because it's irrelevan
by 011011100 13y ago
So we "simply can't know" whether the title should be taken at face value, but at the same time the parent's point is a "useless nitpick" because it's irrelevant to the main point of the article. Nice.
If we "simply can't know" what the point is, then how do you decide what's relevant?
- aptwebapps 13y agoYarg. I _knew_ I shouldn't have included the 'useless nitpick' line as it was needlessly aggressive. But to respond: No, not at the same time. As I said in the edit, the title slipped my mind. Without the title it came across as a useless nitpick, with the title it does not even if I find it an uninteresting avenue of discussion.