Open source projects thrive on contribution by the community. Ruby doesn't charge people to use it and is largely maintained by a friendly, giving community wit

Open source projects thrive on contribution by the community. Ruby doesn't charge people to use it and is largely maintained by a friendly, giving community with a humble 'leader'. Perhaps labeling the OP as 'is it a good deal' and 'unfair to get free work out of people' is not appropriate in this context. I sure hope that some designers who have benefitted from Ruby (or other open source projects) will step forward to contribute their time to redesign ruby-lang.org -- regardless of 'getting featured' or 'not getting paid'. Disclaimer: I'm not a designer.