This is pathetic. And not even necessary: > The ironic thing is, even with the benchmark booster disabled, the Note 3 still comes out faster than the G2 in thi

This is pathetic. And not even necessary: > The ironic thing is, even with the benchmark booster disabled, the Note 3 still comes out faster than the G2 in this test. If the intent behind the boosting was simply to ensure that the Note 3 came out ahead in the benchmark race, it doesn't appear to have been necessary in the first place. The Samsung phone division upper management and marketing team don't seem burdened by an overabundance of neither ethics nor common sense. Or maybe I'm just being naive.