>The magazine Economist is part owned by the Rotschild banking family and it's reporters are attending Bilderberg meetings every year. Articles in the news pape

>The magazine Economist is part owned by the Rotschild banking family and it's reporters are attending Bilderberg meetings every year. Articles in the news paper are not signed so you do not know who wrote them. So? Why does it matter if Rothchild's own part of The Economist. Who cares if they attend Bilderberg, many influential people do. If I recall correctly, it is a good mix of politicians, Banks & Insurance and media. As for the anonymous nature of their pieces: http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/09/economist-explains-itself-1 http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/09/ec...