So, a website provides content to you without a membership free at the "cost" of also having ads on the page. Which you may or may not choose to ignore. Your r

So, a website provides content to you without a membership free at the "cost" of also having ads on the page. Which you may or may not choose to ignore. Your response to this is circumventing the ads and blocking them, denying the service which you use any revenue from you. Awesome. How about if a site has intrusive over/under ads or otherwise intrusive behavior, you just don't visit it? And allow the sites you use that do ads without being jerks about it to actually continue to function and provide the service that you apparently value? EDIT: I'm not normally someone who crusades against ad blocking software, but your comment was extremely obnoxious and really annoyed me.