3 ms·

I don't see how you've proven the illegitimacy of my analogy. It's really the same argument you're making. Perhaps there are Al Qaida affiliated cells that are

I don't see how you've proven the illegitimacy of my analogy. It's really the same argument you're making. Perhaps there are Al Qaida affiliated cells that are only Al Qaida affiliated in name and ideology but do not receive funding or orders from anyone else. In any case there are people that identify as being members of Al Qaida (Al Qaida proper or affiliated groups). I don't see what, effectively, is the difference between a monolithic organizations and a heterogeneous group of organization that have a shared ideology. I think this is what you're saying that Al Qaida is but I don't see how this distinction is significant for any intent or purpose.

jlgreco 13y ago
> "I don't see how you've proven the illegitimacy of my analogy." Simply put: there are established and agreed upon ways of determining whether somebody is a member of North Dakota; it isn't an association that can be created retroactively or without proof. Furthermore, I can claim that I am North Dakotan, but I simply am not. I can claim it as much as I want, but it doesn't make it true. With Anonymous or Al Qaeda? Claiming membership seems to be all that is required.
- tylerkahn 13y ago
  Fair enough. I see your point. North Dakota is a geographical region. Either you reside or have resided in that area or you haven't. It's not an ideological movement or organization. I'm interested to hear your response to the other part of my argument. That is, what, effectively, is the difference between a monolithic organization and a heterogenous group of organizations with a shared ideology?
  - jlgreco 13y ago
    It concerns me because there is typically little to no evidence that there is are shared ideology, or a shared anything besides "(probably) being Muslim, and shooting at us". Specifically why this concerns me I explained here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6471710 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6471710

jlgreco 13y ago

> "I don't see how you've proven the illegitimacy of my analogy." Simply put: there are established and agreed upon ways of determining whether somebody is a member of North Dakota; it isn't an association that can be created retroactively or without proof. Furthermore, I can claim that I am North Dakotan, but I simply am not. I can claim it as much as I want, but it doesn't make it true. With Anonymous or Al Qaeda? Claiming membership seems to be all that is required.

tylerkahn 13y ago
Fair enough. I see your point. North Dakota is a geographical region. Either you reside or have resided in that area or you haven't. It's not an ideological movement or organization. I'm interested to hear your response to the other part of my argument. That is, what, effectively, is the difference between a monolithic organization and a heterogenous group of organizations with a shared ideology?
- jlgreco 13y ago
  It concerns me because there is typically little to no evidence that there is are shared ideology, or a shared anything besides "(probably) being Muslim, and shooting at us". Specifically why this concerns me I explained here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6471710 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6471710