3 ms·
This is an interesting thought, but history has already shown the outcome. Shelf space dominated by the big players and defacto price fixing. A better approach
by commentzorro 13y ago
This is an interesting thought, but history has already shown the outcome. Shelf space dominated by the big players and defacto price fixing.
A better approach would be for a few very high quality niche apps to get together an open their own app store. They sell only though their store and price the apps appropriately. Thus starting boutique markets. Could happen now with Android but currently not Apple.
- derefr 13y agoWithout needing to support sideloading, Apple could let users group apps on the store into their own collections, which other users could browse. They could even let the users theme them, somewhat like Apple's own decorated collections -- and give the "curator" a user ends up purchasing from a small cut (5-10%) of the sale price. In other words, replicate the well-trodden player-vendor system from MMOs.
- commentzorro 13y agoNo ... a couple quick examples. Kids don't go to Walmart looking for the Abercrombie & Fitch department. They want the fantasy built around the brand and that means their own stores. Stihl when the dealer route because they wanted to differentiate their higher quality and provide a more personal customer relationship than Walmart would allow. Gotta get Apple out of that lock-in in order to support true boutique shops.
- derefr 13y agoI guess that depends on whether you see the App Store as a single shop, a department store, or a mall. There might not be Abercrombie & Fitch departments in Walmart, but there are certainly Apple-store-themed electronics sub-departments within Best Buy.
- commentzorro 13y agoYou got it. I think the sub-departments is exactly the wrong model. Completely separate stores with completely separate and unique identities. Apps not also sold in the app store. Boutique shops selling and supporting a very narrow vertical.