4 ms·
Most of the article seemed to be defending Gideon Levy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gideon_Levy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gideon_Levy), so I don't think it
by James_Duval 13y ago
Most of the article seemed to be defending Gideon Levy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gideon_Levy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gideon_Levy), so I don't think it has a pro-Israeli bias.
- Cyph0n 13y agoIt looks pro-Israel to me.
- thomasz 13y agoThat is a pretty useless^H^H^H^H^H^H^H subjective statement. The author is clearly trying to alternate between examples for pro Israeli and pro Palestinian bias.
- vxNsr 13y agoWell the user's name is Rav Papa, who is a well known Jewish roman-era scholar, which is one tactic he doesn't mention, press all your advantages, usernames are a great way to show fain to be one side but really be the other.
- thomasz 13y agoWell, I wasn't aware. Now that we know about his evil ethnicity, we can stop talking about his article and finally condemn the filthy Jew.
- vxNsr 13y agoLol, I wish you had looked at my comment history before you had said that. ( I too have been outed as a JUDEENRAT). Personally I think he was attempting to be impartial though towards the end it became apparent that he was more pro-BDS than peace (now you know how I feel about this).
- mistercow 13y agoThe author uses both pro- and anti- Israel examples.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]