> But I think the resolution is that the receiver did agree to let Google read both emails. “Google’s alleged interceptions are neither instrumental to the pro

> But I think the resolution is that the receiver did agree to let Google read both emails. “Google’s alleged interceptions are neither instrumental to the provision of email services, nor are they an incidental effect of providing these services. The Court therefore finds that Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged that the interceptions fall outside Google’s ordinary course of business...”