2 ms·
Thanks. This makes much more sense sense now. I'd still be tempted to use some kind of a typedef for the field, but yeah, you'd not want to derive it from the s
by cbsmith 13y ago
Thanks. This makes much more sense sense now. I'd still be tempted to use some kind of a typedef for the field, but yeah, you'd not want to derive it from the system's time_t structure.