3 ms·

So give some indication of how they would in any way be able to show malice in this case, let alone a defamatory statement.

• jlgreco 13y ago
  Seriously, people voice suspicions about corruption and bribery on the internet thousands of times every day. Rather specific suspicions about specific people, which is a lot more than what the ancestor post did. How many /r/politics or /r/conspiracy or /r/occupywallstreet posters have been sued for libel? There is no realistic risk that the ancestor post will have to test his theories on libel in court; it just flat out isn't going to play out that way.
  • deleted 13y ago
    [deleted]
    • deleted 13y ago
      [deleted]
      • moocowduckquack 13y ago
        I realised, please excuse me this complete and utter brain-fart, I'm going to stop posting things now and go to sleep. Is for the best. :)
  • moocowduckquack 13y ago
    Sorry, misread name, made stupid post.