3 ms·
I think beside familiar PostgreSQL enviroment there is not much advantage over SAP HANA. I listed advantages of HANA on my posting https://news.ycombinator.com/
by ceyhunkazel 13y ago
I think beside familiar PostgreSQL enviroment there is not much advantage over SAP HANA. I listed advantages of HANA on my posting
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6466222 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6466222
- mtam 13y agoRedshift is a SQL relational database for large structured data volumes, whereas Amazon EMR (Elastic MapReduce) is for non-structured data. The Redshift FAQ has more details on this topic: http://aws.amazon.com/redshift/faqs/#0120 http://aws.amazon.com/redshift/faqs/#0120 Other than the marketing buzz from SAP, I have not seen any reputable (neutral) comparison between Hana and Redshift that includes price. I also have never met anyone that uses/run Hana that was not already an SAP ERP client, albeit the fact that SAP keeps saying Hana is the fastest-growing product in the company's history.
- tonywe64 13y agoI don't think it makes sense to compare Redshift to HANA. There is no way that HANA could scale the way ParAccel/Vertica scales within the same price range. Besides all the marketing buzz SAP has been throwing it out there, how many companies actually use it with a decent amount of data (at least 10TB+ range)?