5 ms·
From your comment, I thought Simon was in danger of being subjected to some dangerous medical procedure. It looks like this is about supporting Simon against th
by johnnybgoode 17y ago
From your comment, I thought Simon was in danger of being subjected to some dangerous medical procedure. It looks like this is about supporting Simon against the use of unjust libel laws, not the treatment itself.
- RiderOfGiraffes 17y agoYes, the latter. Sorry for the confusion. I'm currently on the road and have flakey internet connectivity. I should've been clearer. Simon wrote a piece saying that some of the treatments the British Chiropratic Association offer and recommend have no scientific basis, and no scientific evidence. For saying this he is being sued for libel. The intial ruling has taken one sentence from his article and interpreted it completely out of context. It means that anyone writing anything that might be read in the UK can be sued for libel if any sentence can be taken out of context and interpreted as libellous. Please read the articles, and please sign the petition. Assuming you agree that having evidence is important in medical procedures.