4 ms·
Perhaps because a 2br is typically less than 2x a 1br. So you can divide these numbers by two and also give the city an affordability benefit-of-doubt that peop
by nullc 13y ago
Perhaps because a 2br is typically less than 2x a 1br. So you can divide these numbers by two and also give the city an affordability benefit-of-doubt that people would pool living spaces.
- Glyptodon 13y agoEven if a 2-br is less per room than 1-br, with minimum wage jobs I'd think you'd be looking at lowest cost, not most efficient price.
- dragonwriter 13y agoA larger, more efficiently priced unit can be shared by multiple people, reducing the distinction between "most efficient price" and "lowest cost".
- Glyptodon 13y agoGood point. I guess you could look at map as a count of how many people need to share a 2 bedroom if you view it that way.