4 ms·
She also apparently doesn't even understand the NSA violations that she was trying to talk about [1] [1] http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/09/27/whoa-whoa-whoa-st
by detcader 13y ago
She also apparently doesn't even understand the NSA violations that she was trying to talk about [1]
[1] http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/09/27/whoa-whoa-whoa-stop-dianne-feinstein-misstates-the-2011-violations/ http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/09/27/whoa-whoa-whoa-stop-dia...
- j-g-faustus 13y agoI was struck by this part: "FEINSTEIN: [...] upstream collection [...] comprises about 10 percent of all collection that takes place under 702, and occurs when NSA obtains Internet communications, such as e-mails, from certain U.S. companies that operate the Internet [backbone]" If vacuuming the internet backbone is only 10% of the data they collect, where the hell do they find enough data to fill the remaining 90%? Phone calls/SMS? Banks/payments? Encryption they can't break, so they have to ask the endpoint, like Lavabit?
- pyre 13y agoIt's possible that this is a misunderstanding of terms. It seems reasonable that when the NSA pulls up all data on a single person only 10% of it comes from the Internet firehose, and the other 90% comes from Facebook/Google/etc. They may be sucking up all of the Internet, but are not able to correlate is to a person 100% of the time in an automated fashion.