I don't understand the FPS debate. Do you know what's better for racing games? http://i.imgur.com/HYOmoQl.jpg http://i.imgur.com/HYOmoQl.jpg - Racing Wheel and

I don't understand the FPS debate. Do you know what's better for racing games? http://i.imgur.com/HYOmoQl.jpg http://i.imgur.com/HYOmoQl.jpg - Racing Wheel and Pedals Flying games? http://i.imgur.com/ejf4hPf.jpg http://i.imgur.com/ejf4hPf.jpg - Joysticks Fighting games? http://i.imgur.com/2lrevkG.jpg http://i.imgur.com/2lrevkG.jpg - Arcade Sticks There's one device that works best for every single game genre, and mouse and keyboard is that device for FPS games. Why do people expect one device to match the functionality of all of the above inputs. They're vastly different experiences, it's simply not going to happen. Controllers work great for action games, platformers, and overall, they're the best well rounded device. They're not designed to compete with the above controllers, they're a general input device, so they're not going to be as efficient as something built for a specific task. If you're a hardcore FPS gamer, bring your mouse and keyboard into the living room, or play at your desk. This is no different than someone buying a wheel if they're into racing simulators. I think Valve is achieving an even more well rounded device. By the sounds of things, it'll improve the FPS and RTS experience on a controller. It'll most likely make sacrifices to achieve that goal. For example, fighting games might work better on a more traditional controller. However, the Steam library has a much higher number of FPS and RTS games, so that trade off makes sense.