4 ms·
As you mentioned, it's been covered ad nauseum and pg has decided not to implement it for whatever reason. I suppose it's due to the size of the growth of the d
by ScottWhigham 17y ago
As you mentioned, it's been covered ad nauseum and pg has decided not to implement it for whatever reason. I suppose it's due to the size of the growth of the database if you allow that (thus requiring more hardware) but I have no clue really.