4 ms·
An excellent example of both faux-deconstruction http://www.info.ucl.ac.be/~pvr/decon.html http://www.info.ucl.ac.be/~pvr/decon.html and intellectual impostors
by madair 17y ago
An excellent example of both faux-deconstruction http://www.info.ucl.ac.be/~pvr/decon.html http://www.info.ucl.ac.be/~pvr/decon.html and intellectual impostors as described by Dawkins http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/dawkins.html http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/dawkins.html, also seen on Hacker News :-D
Seriously, read both those articles and compare with this if you think I'm trolling.
Anti-consumerists dancing on capitalists' graves are getting jiggy too soon. Eyeballs still equals sales, there just isn't quite as much money swirling around the system right now.
[Edited for clarity]
- hvs 17y agoFor a second there I thought that your second link going to say that Richard Dawkins was an intellectual imposter!
- madair 17y agoMost definitely not, I should have worded that better, I've edited it now.
- akamaka 17y agoThis article is not either of the things you suggested. It's not jargon and babble, and the argument is pretty clear: cinsumerist society is on the brink of collapse. The problem is that AdBusters has been saying this over and over in every single issue since I first read it, years ago. They must be pretty happy with the recession, since it somewhat legitimatizes their predictions, for now. Once the economy recovers, though, I'm sure they'll still keep beating the same drum. AdBusters is kind of like a magazine version of "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire", published in 1776. At the time, the Britsh were very concerned by the state of their own empire, and gobbled up this bleak and pessemistic (and highly misleading) version of history. There's always going to be someone with an apetite for this sort of thing, so that keeps AdBusters in business.