3 ms·
Yes, Brits may put more focus on which university you go to, but that isn't necessarily a bad thing. In the UK, getting into Oxbridge is nowhere near as diffic
by jstevens85 17y ago
Yes, Brits may put more focus on which university you go to, but that isn't necessarily a bad thing.
In the UK, getting into Oxbridge is nowhere near as difficult as getting into Harvard, Yale, Princeton. There are 24,000 undergraduate spots at Oxbridge for 60 million Brits, compared to 17,000 spots at HYP for 300 million Americans.
Also, the application criteria at Oxbridge is far simpler. It is based entirely on academic potential. British universities are uninterested in extracurricular activities and "well-roundedness". In the US, very smart students with perfect grades are rejected from Harvard because they weren't editor of the school newspaper, because they got a D in History in 9th grade, or because they couldn't write a good essay about "If you were going to sing a song in a talent show, what would you sing and why?" That doesn't happen in the UK. If you are smart, work hard in school and get good grades, you'll get into Oxbridge. The same can't be said for getting into HYP.
All of the British universities are public, so there doesn't exist the situation where students may choose to go to Berkeley instead of UPenn because they want to save money, or because they were offered a scholarship.
Which university you attend in the UK tends to be a better indicator of intelligence and academic success than where you study in the US.
- daveungerer 17y agoWow, I genuinely never knew that about the UK. It's strange how the flood of information on US universities drowns out everything else. From what your saying, that makes Oxbridge rather attractive for many people on this site, who were never interested in being "well-rounded" just for the sake of university admission.