3 ms·
He didn't mention other frameworks - but how JS doesn't give you two-way bindings. Which it doesn't. Your second point is about Handlebars, which isn't even me
by ulisesrmzroche 13y ago
He didn't mention other frameworks - but how JS doesn't give you two-way bindings. Which it doesn't. Your second point is about Handlebars, which isn't even mentioned in the comment you replied to.
- steveklabnik 13y agoMy parent suggests two way binding requires manually annotating the DOM, implying that it's an Angular-exclusive feature. Furthermore, those who don't like annotation aren't writing JavaScript views, they're writing HTML templates and annotating them with some JS, which means the parent offers a false dichotomy.
- ulisesrmzroche 13y agoNo, that wasn't implied. He's just saying that's what it's there for in this example.
- steveklabnik 13y agoI guess we just read it differently, then.
- ulisesrmzroche 13y agoWe did, and he just corrected you, so there's that.
- steveklabnik 13y agoPLONK
- aidos 13y agoIncorrect. I was saying that the joke example presented didn't in anyway show the difference in power that Angular gives you over raw js - nothing at all about Angular exclusivity.
- steveklabnik 13y agoWord. I think we can all agree that EVERY framework is far better than plain old JS; the comparison is so nonsensical to me that I assumed you couldn't possibly be making it. Seems good!