5 ms·
Leo Laporte loses it with Mike Arrington on the Gillmor Gang
- dcurtis 17y agoIt seemed like a slight overreaction here, but I have a feeling this was built-up rage over something else.
- bkbleikamp 17y agoAgreed, Arrington's initial comment seemed to be a joke playing on all the accusations of him not disclosing his interests in start ups that are reviewed on TechCrunch.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- access_denied 17y agoI guess Leo is genuinely interested in technology. Arrington? I don't know off course but he doesn't seem to care.
- jsz0 17y agoProbably. It's such trash journalism this Arrington guy deals in. He should probably be covering celebrity gossip, not technology. Anyone can go try out a Pre, many people have review units, and he didn't even let him answer the question before suggesting bias.
- qeorge 17y agoHere's what I don't understand: I see anti-Arrington comments like this frequently, yet TechCrunch appears on the frontpage every day (usually several times a day). Where's the disconnect? (Full disclosure: I received a Mike Arrington review copy)
- pg 17y agoTC is polarizing, but HN doesn't have downvotes.
- qeorge 17y agoBut isn't not upvoting a form of downvoting?
- ynniv 17y agoNo, if 100 people love something and 100 people hate it, it will show up on the front page with +100. With downvoting, it would not show up on the front page with a score of 0.
- weaksauce 17y agoIt should be also mentioned that on most days it only takes a handful of votes to get to the front page.
- ynniv 17y agoIt might take a lot more with downvoting!
- weaksauce 17y agoIt would certainly take more to get to the front page with downvoting. I think the trouble with downvoting is if you have a polarizing story that is interesting the vocal minority could in practice downvote stories that don't align with their worldview. Thus censoring an otherwise merit based story economy. I was toying with different downvoting schemes but all of them seemed flawed in a fundamental way: You could have downvotes after a certain threshold. You could have downvoting carry a different weight based on how much karma you have. You could have downvotes only after a certain time has passed thus making stories with polarizing opinions not get squashed immediately but still allow for the opposition to have their voice heard. You could have downvotes only enabled on submissions from members under a certain karma threshold. I am sure there are many more ways to do the downvoting but I think there is a more fundamental problem with downvotes in that it creates a kind of hostile community. It might be worth having the occasional dumb story come to the front page to keep this place a civil place. Downvotes in the comment section should be reserved for a person that does not further the discussion or is overly rude to another member here.
- ruby_roo 17y agoIf Leo pressed on, wouldn't that have been a case of feeding the troll? Arrington even eggs him on with "Whatcha gonna do about it?" What a prick.
- yan 17y agoHa ha, I just noticed the Wikipedia page for Arrington: J. Michael Arrington (born March 13, 1970 in Orange, California)[1] is a troll, entrepreneur and was the maintainer[2] of TechCrunch, a blog covering the Silicon Valley technology start-up communities and the wider technology field in USA and elsewhere. Wonder how long that'll stay up..
- quizbiz 17y agoThe only thing this video did for me was remind me of TechTV. Never seen this side of him but I really do miss TechTV.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- treyp 17y agoYou should catch up and starting watching the Gillmor Gang. Leo has some respectable and well-informed opinions. He actually cares about technology, not plugging himself.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- webology 17y agoLeo was justified to call Arrington out. What a douchebag thing to imply honestly.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- pg 17y agoWhile you fan the flames, the principals are apologizing to one another.
- reitzensteinm 17y agoOf course they're apologizing, it would be crazy to let a vendetta form over something like this. But that doesn't mean Leo wasn't justified here.
- nailer 17y agoIf he'd let Arrington, speak, Arrington would have mentioned that Palm seems to have only been giving review units to reviewers who have previously given the Palm Pre favorable coverage.
- staunch 17y agoThey're talking to each other directly now. Both said they were basically mortified about the incident. I have more respect for Arrington after this than before it.
- tptacek 17y agoA pox on both their houses.
- webology 17y agoI'm honestly not surprised since Leo is a nice guy. However, it speaks to Arrington's character that he would accuse Leo of bias before allowing him to explain why he liked the pre. I agree with Leo's original assessment that Arrington is a Troll.
- bbuffone 17y agoI usually listen to TWIT as a podcast, but this makes me want to tune into the live feed to see if there is a follow up.
- dennykmiu 17y agoI subscribe to TWIT and Macbreak Weekly. I enjoyed the panel members (which are differently for the two shows, both the regular ones and the occasional). But what I enjoy the most is Laporte himself. I like his style and the effort that he puts in day in and day out to understand the technology. But mostly he is a very generous person, never cut off his guests and always let them be the experts. This is the first time that I have seen him standing up for himself and I like it. Good going, Leo.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- snprbob86 17y agosigh TechCrunch is a whole bunch of trolls, but there aren't enough startup news sites. I read TechCrunch in my pile of feeds, but with a large grain of salt. Is there a site which covers basically the same news, without the silly Twitter love fest, and with less asshole-ish editors? I'd really love to see real journalists who believe in "be good" doing a solid site. If that were to happen, people could send their exclusives and firsts there to slowly put TechCrunch out of business.
- htsh 17y agoAgree wholeheartedly. Techcrunch has its faults, but its the only site doing what it does. To nerds who are used to civilized, crowd-moderated discussions on slashdot/reddit/HN, sites like TC and mashable look like big troll kingdoms, but we have to take what we get. The other thing worth noting is that outside of geek world, just about everything seems like troll kingdom. I want to puke when I see sites with millions of visitors but without threaded discussions, but its a sad reality and a slow process. The nerds are always ahead of the curve. The sad/funny thing is that slashdot didn't have these issues in the late 90's. In terms of a site that covers the same news without the dickishness, aren't we on it right now? This is the best startup-news site I've ever found. And when t/c posts something worth reading, its usually here within minutes.
- vyrotek 17y agoOh if only such a site existed... I would love to drop TechCrunch completely.
- ciscoriordan 17y ago
- htsh 17y agoThe interruption was a bit rude. Arrington is a lawyer, and that's just what legal folks do. Laporte felt it was a bit disrespectful, and though the level of reaction was not warranted, a reaction was understandable. Laporte has been around forever, and I think he's earned a pretty good reputation amongst nerds. Also, have you seen crunchgear? These people do not know their tech -- that much is clear. They are in the business of selling tech, not creating it. That being said, they're important. I'm a recovering lawyer myself and I left because working with lawyers was worse than anything I had experienced before (which was working mainly with startups and non-profits in NY). Its fascinating to me. There are a lot of bitter nerds out there who passionately hate T/C, like fanatically so. It seems the slashdot/reddit crowd has repeatedly criticized those guys for being marketers rather than geeks, and they are right in that basic premise but I think the level of animosity is unwarranted. Even if these guys aren't pedigreed nerds, they are fascinated by and love technology and they are an important part of the industry. Its one of the reasons I like HN -- it has a much more nuanced view of the important role folks like Arrington and the VC community play in the bigger world outside of nerdland.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- quisxt 17y agoI think there are at least a few nerds who also hate TechCrunch because of some pretty shoddy journalism like the whole Last.fm imbroglio.
- htsh 17y agoYeah, agreed. Though he tries his best to hide the fact, Arrington was a lawyer at a big law firm, neither a nerd nor a journalist. And here he is running a "news" site about technology. To his credit, he filled a void. I wish there were folks like Arrington around and things like the VC-funded "internet week" in NY this week back in 1999 during the first dot-com boom. Something is better than nothing. And he's on the right side of a lot of things -- specifically on intellectual property regulation. And also to his credit, he's trying and he listens. He's been responding to commenters on his site and there's something to be said about that.
- darreld 17y agoArrington is a complete hole and Leo does actually care about technology. I was kind of puzzled why Leo started with the Gilmore Gang anyway. The show is 98% attitudes and is generally idea-free. It was good to see Leo blow up over Arrington's trolling.
- ahoyhere 17y agoHe just couldn't let Dvorak have all the (inane, gasbag, technically incorrect) fun?
- malte 17y agoLeo Laporte comments on TC article: "Thanks for the post, Mike. Apology accepted. Now that I know what was going on in your mind, I apologize to you. There seems to be something about the Gillmor Gang that just engenders over the top passion. I’m embarrassed by my overreaction. Peace."
- ivankirigin 17y agoThis isn't important.
- tptacek 17y agoCrazy weird to me that you think that. Some of the most respected institutions in journalism are cratering --- when the NYT screws up, people make movies about it --- and what we're left with are the agile, light-weight, utterly unmoored web news outlets. If we ran politics here, I'd be giving you the same rant about HuffPo and RCP. But we run tech and entrepreneurship here, and if things break the wrong way for us (and him, I guess), Michael Arrington could be the next Robert Moses.
- mahmud 17y agoThere goes the realest mofo on this forum. People don't see this is what we're trading real journalism for. Diva bloggers that have to be kissed up to.
- ivankirigin 17y agoI find most news coverage to be lacking incisive commentary, regardless of the source#. Personalities in that news coverage aren't relevant, and paying attention to personal dramas (especially in cases like this - a simple misunderstanding largely caused by the medium) is even less important. I think the way to make today's tech bloggers better is to pay attention to the stories and reporting that matters. Besides voting with our clicks, there is little else we can do to influence the market. # edit: I think this means news is largely fungible. That's why there are so many social filters like twitter and tumblr and HN. Your peers voting on content is a better way to filter than tracking a reputable source.
- pageman 17y ago755 comments and counting on Leo's ff: http://friendfeed.com/twit-conversations/1d37431c/live-now-gillmor-gang-with-steve-mike-arrington http://friendfeed.com/twit-conversations/1d37431c/live-now-g... and it looks like Arrington's apology has been accepted: "Thanks for the post, Mike. Apology accepted. Now that I know what was going on in your mind, I apologize to you. There seems to be something about the Gillmor Gang that just engenders over the top passion. I’m embarrassed by my overreaction. Peace."
- jasonlbaptiste 17y agoIf we're going to keep this on the frontpage, then Valleywag gets to come back. Same kind of thing.
- drawkbox 17y agohrm, seems to me it could be a well played PR stunt. A Biggie vs. 2Pac or Microsoft vs. Google type competition. Probably not but there is probability that it is. If not they could use that for what it is worth.
- drawkbox 17y agoBecause the launch of a new phone, Techcrunch (Arrington) and Leo Laporte (nice guy but still marketing) don't have anything in common with a PR campaign or marketing campaign at all. Maybe Leo isn't guilty but Arrington does try to get controversy going. Nothing wrong with that in the PR business that he is in, TC does it well. Judging by the reaction to this event and the response to my saying there is a probability of a PR stunt, I would say stuff like this is easier to pull off than you think.
- jneal 17y agoThank god! I've been watching Leo Laporte on Twit Live for over a year, but I recently stopped watching as much because every time I tuned in, I had to watch the Gillmore Gang, and that guy always was such a douchebag and I could not stand to here him belittle everyone and speak as if he was some god and everyone else was just little peons. He was annoying, and made me even stop watching Leo Laporte. Good riddance.
- fatherofmine 17y agoI REALLY HOPE 4CHAN GOES AFTER MIKE ARRINGTON!!!!!!!!!!