As far as I can tell from the parent post 300bps does not reject the science of AGW You're right - I do not reject the science of AGW. Here is my absolute con

As far as I can tell from the parent post 300bps does not reject the science of AGW You're right - I do not reject the science of AGW. Here is my absolute concrete position: It is foolish to squander finite resources. I believe fossil fuels and clean air are finite resources. So while I don't reject AGW science, I think its messengers are terrible at PR and practice a level of dishonesty to attempt to further their cause (which so far has had the opposite effect). Having said that - I think for the most part we want the same thing - conservation. I have 3 kids; I want them and their descendants to have the same chance at life that I had. It sickens me to think that we might selfishly destroy the world's ability to sustain human life.