3 ms·
But in the longer term, isn't it the global cooling rather than the global warming that is more disastrous to human beings and the eco-system?
by ttflee 13y ago
But in the longer term, isn't it the global cooling rather than the global warming that is more disastrous to human beings and the eco-system?
- MrZongle2 13y agoI think this is an excellent question. There's been a lot of panic over the rise of sea levels and a warmer climate, but why exactly is this a world-ending disaster? Yes, the coastlines may change and yes, people will be displaced. Such has been the case for all of recorded history, and far before. Humans can adapt: they have, and they will again. I find the idea of geoengineering far more terrifying than global warming. The community that can't get their models to explain the last few years of observations now wants to throw a massive new wrench into the works? Madness.
- csense 13y agoExactly. If the sea levels rise ten meters overnight, that would be an enormous catastrophe with unfathomable loss of life. If the sea levels rise ten meters over a couple decades, people will get the heck out when the water's at their ankles, instead of patiently waiting a few years until it's over their heads. Or figure out a local civil engineering solution like diverting the water with levees and dams, that's at worst a local disaster if it doesn't work out.
- talmand 13y agoYou are quite wrong good sir, or madam, as someone else in this thread explained that millions will drown with a drastic change in sea levels over 1000 years. Actually, I'm assuming they were greatly exaggerating which seems to be commonplace in these types of discussions so I decided to poke a little fun at that one. Something about learning to swim and inventing something called a boat.