I'm not sure this point really gets through. The way the article read to me was "Testing is simple and easy (1)" 1: small print - writing good tests is hard I

I'm not sure this point really gets through. The way the article read to me was "Testing is simple and easy (1)" 1: small print - writing good tests is hard I could likewise argue that "writing code is simple and easy, but writing good code is hard", but this statement has little value in itself. It seems more an argument against using complex testing frameworks and going for simpler syntax. As a fan of Nose, I absolutely agree.