3 ms·
Interesting, but I wonder how well it will do? Bootstrap is already very widespread and benefits from network effects. Foundation is a nice alternative to Boots
by beat 13y ago
Interesting, but I wonder how well it will do? Bootstrap is already very widespread and benefits from network effects. Foundation is a nice alternative to Bootstrap that appeals to people looking for such (I'm a Foundation user myself). But a third framework? Can it get traction?
- taproot 13y agoOf course it can, if it offers something different. Compared to bootstrap 3 I don't really see it. Even their own biased comparison doesn't really show a difference if any. For their comparison I would have preferred to see what makes it different on the less side of things. Ie used bootstrap properly.
- _JamesA_ 13y agoWhat about the [Gumby Framework]? Doesn't that count as a third with traction already? [Gumby Framework]: http://gumbyframework.com/ http://gumbyframework.com/
- vanadium 13y agoBootstrap doesn't care about your environment, can be abstracted easily into automated Grunt->Assemble generation (amongst other flows) using JSON data as the informer, works with an immense amount of different use cases, has highly active forks with SASS rather than LESS (if that's your flavor), and doesn't care about your development model regarding JavaScript. In effect, it's neutrally-opinionated on a high level. Gumby might have its merits, but if I'm working with a set of fairly green developers new to the industry, I'm not throwing a highly-opinionated system at them to back them into a corner.