3 ms·

>From the point-of-view of a web developer, JSP is virtually invisible. By "invisible", do you mean that webapps that use JSP typically use URL mapping so that

>From the point-of-view of a web developer, JSP is virtually invisible. By "invisible", do you mean that webapps that use JSP typically use URL mapping so that you never see the .jsp extension? If not, then I'm not sure I get your meaning. >I've yet to come across a more human-readable language... Yeah, I think its readability leads to a verbosity that is, ironically, the source of some complaints about Java. But, Java kind of embraces that verbosity to some extent. I've even seen style "standards" that discourage the use of language "shortcuts" because they are believed to decrease readability.

James_Duval 13y ago
> By "invisible", do you mean that webapps that use JSP typically use URL mapping so that you never see the .jsp extension? If not, then I'm not sure I get your meaning. Oh, I just meant that JSP is never, ever mentioned in any mainstream web development magazine - it's absent from discussion, not practice. Back-end programming seems to be exclusively PHP/ROR if I go from what I read on web dev blogs, forums and news sources. I may simply be reading the wrong sources, of course.