3 ms·
I had LASEK* 2 or 3 years ago and it's been nothing but incredible. I now see 20/15. With LASEK there is no cutting of the eye, so there is no risk of halos or
by ada1981 13y ago
I had LASEK* 2 or 3 years ago and it's been nothing but incredible. I now see 20/15.
With LASEK there is no cutting of the eye, so there is no risk of halos or of the flap coming loose later in life. Something like 80-90% of the complications are from the flap, so LASEK is much safer. It takes a day or so longer to heal, but the results are worth it. One of the coolest things I've ever done, and zero negative side effects. Infact, for the first 6 months of so I walked around NYC like I was on acid - just amazed at how clear everything was and being able to see things like bricks on the top corners of buildings 60 stories tall.
Also, the feeling of waking up in the morning without my eyes all f'd up from sleeping in contacts is priceless. I literally found myself crying tears of joy and gratitude on several occasions for how amazing this was. I was happier simply from being able to see better. And it's helped a ton with my ultimate frisbee game and helped me better deal with sand for beach sports.
If you want a laugh, google Dr. Emil Chynn -- he is a brilliant doctor but also a bit eccentric. He was recently on Howard Stern offering $100k to help him find a wife ;) and then book an appointment to see him.
If you'd like a personal introduction to him, feel free to email me (anthony@creditcovers.com) and I can help you get a free consult and friends & family discount. He also has financing available.
Seriously, if you wear glasses or contacts get this done as soon as you can and look into LASEK (no cut, no flap). If you are in NYC check out Park Avenue Safe Sight (LASEK) and Dr. Emil Chynn.
EDIT: I should mention that with the "HD Upgrade" that I got you get a level of clarity that is impossible to reach with glasses or contacts. It's supposed to be 25x more accurate a prescription because they do a laser scan of the entire surface of the eye, and then create micro prescriptions for every area -- sort of like dimples on a golf ball vs. 1 lens like glasses or contects which basically takes the average prescription for the entire eye. LASEK is superior - more accurate, no halos (since no scar tissue), no flap to fall off, better than 20/20 vision, less risk of infection.. Really an amazing technology (oh and I got a DVd of my eyes being lasered ;) )
- outworlder 13y agoAren't the halos created by a large pupil reaching an area which was not touched by the laser? That was my understanding, at least. If so, LASEK would still carry the risk of halos. But not dry eyes, and no flap dislocation. If that flap DOES dislocate (usually, because of trauma), you are screwed.
- ada1981 13y agoI thought the halo was from the edge of the flap having scar tissue - I could be off on the cause. But to my understanding there isn't halo risk with the no cut / no flap procedure.