4 ms·
I'm quite happy with the modern flexbox syntax. I did a lot of work with XUL and xulrunner years ago - it was slick having things automatically flow into place,
by erichurkman 13y ago
I'm quite happy with the modern flexbox syntax. I did a lot of work with XUL and xulrunner years ago - it was slick having things automatically flow into place, but the syntax (and syntax of the derivative box-flex CSS properties), but it seemed to require very heavy markup to get things "right".
Flexie [1] appears to provide a polyfill version of flexbox. Has anyone used it in a major production site? What was your experience? There were a few polyfill-type projects for the older syntax, but I never got them to work very well for anything but the most basic layouts.
[1] http://flexiejs.com/ http://flexiejs.com/
- philipwalton 13y agoFlexie provides a polyfill for the outdated syntax `display:box`. The library's creator (@doctyper) is working on a new polyfill for the new syntax `display:flex`, but as far as I know it's still in development. https://github.com/doctyper/reflexie https://github.com/doctyper/reflexie