4 ms·Yea: s/encryption/hash function/ 'encryption' -> 'hash function' for those that dont grok sedby ballard 13y agoYea: s/encryption/hash function/ 'encryption' -> 'hash function' for those that dont grok sedeinhverfr 13y agoRight, but it is a cryptographic hash, so presumably it would be better to call it a "cryptographic standard."ballard 13y agoYou're trying to invent an argument based on depth of specificity, when both are equally valid. The title was fixed.