3 ms·
> people don’t really believe in anything in our society anymore Should I believe that? (And is this another way of say "This time is different"?) Is it actu
by wwweston 13y ago
> people don’t really believe in anything in our society anymore
Should I believe that?
(And is this another way of say "This time is different"?)
Is it actually possible for people not to believe anything, in our society or any society?
> In other words, if the majority of people believe there is a bubble, there is not, by definition, a bubble.
Does this go beyond first-order consequences? Is it also true that the more people utilize the rationale to convince themselves that talk of/paranoia regarding a bubble is a sign of no bubble, the more likely there can be a bubble?
Also, there seems to be the assumption that when people realize there's a bubble, they'll immediately engage in attenuating behavior. I think there's evidence to the contrary -- that as long as people can see a way to continue to profit from it (say, a critical mass of people believing everyone else is the greater fool), a bubble can continue while being widely acknowledged.
- jonnathanson 13y ago"Is it actually possible for people not to believe anything, in our society or any society?" "We are nihilists, Lebowski! We believe in nothing!" Sorry, couldn't resist. :) With all due respect to Peter Thiel, who is much smarter and more successful than I am, I'm really baffled by the statement that "people in our society don't really believe in anything anymore." And I am especially baffled by the implication that this putative, ubiquitous nihilo-cynicism -- even if we accept it to be true, which I don't -- necessarily precludes the formation of bubbles. Did people not believe in anything back in the mid-2000s housing bubble? It seems as if they believed in housing, for one thing. The belief was "widespread and intense" enough to cause a serious freakin' problem. I'm going to give a guy like Peter Thiel the benefit of the doubt and assume that I'm missing a lot for lack of context. But that quote, at least out of its original context and so presented, is really strange.
- wwweston 13y ago> "We are nihilists, Lebowski! We believe in nothing!" :) > With all due respect to Peter Thiel, who is much smarter and more successful than I am Remember, these two things sometimes go together. Another guy who's more successful than many of us said “Success is a lousy teacher. It seduces smart people into thinking they can't lose.” > I'm going to give a guy like Peter Thiel the benefit of the doubt and assume that I'm missing a lot for lack of context I'm a little less generous; my guess is that what Thiel says is very smart indeed in the context of boosting certain business interests and/or political philosophies.
- jonnathanson 13y ago"my guess is that what Thiel says is very smart indeed in the context of boosting certain business interests and/or political philosophies." Well yes, there's certainly that as well. I'd be hard pressed to say that Peter Thiel has no vested interests in the status quo.