3 ms·
Yeah, you're naive. Yes, there are slightly more violent crimes in Oakland than San Francisco (and there's more property crime in San Frnacisco)[1], but on the
by jessepollak 13y ago
Yeah, you're naive.
Yes, there are slightly more violent crimes in Oakland than San Francisco (and there's more property crime in San Frnacisco)[1], but on the whole they are pretty equivalent in terms of safety; especially if you stick to the 'nicer' areas of both.
[1] http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Crime-up-in-Oakland-much-of-Bay-Area-4573391.php http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Crime-up-in-Oakland-much...
- robbyking 13y agoOakland has the 3rd highest violent crime rate per capita in the country: http://www.businessinsider.com/most-dangerous-cities-in-america-2013-6?op=1 http://www.businessinsider.com/most-dangerous-cities-in-amer... And according to the link you posted, Oakland has less than half the population of San Francisco, but 37% more violent crime.
- dllthomas 13y agoParts of Oakland are terrible, but Oakland is flippin' huge.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]