10 ms·
Interesting. The character for greek k (kappa - κ ) is wrong though. The vertical line of the greek k doesn't rise above the rest of the character. It might see
by andmarios 13y ago
Interesting. The character for greek k (kappa - κ ) is wrong though. The vertical line of the greek k doesn't rise above the rest of the character. It might seem small but it really strikes as ugly and wrong for anyone used to the language.
- saidajigumi 13y agoSince it's on Github, consider filing a new issue if someone hasn't gotten to it already: https://github.com/mozilla/Fira/issues https://github.com/mozilla/Fira/issues
- Avitas 13y agoAre the italic versions actually oblique (slanted)? In other words, is there a typographic standard for labeling typefaces italics and oblique? I seem to remember that there is a distinction.
- jamestnz 13y ago>is there a typographic standard for labeling typefaces italics and oblique As I recall it, oblique type uses the regular glyphs just slanted, whereas a 'true' italic typeface employs modified glyph versions having additional calligraphy- or cursive-like flourishes. In the following picture I've just made using Arial and Times, both fonts are claiming an 'italic' version. The Times one really is italic by the above definition, while the Arial one is 'oblique'. http://imgur.com/UVUZb5F http://imgur.com/UVUZb5F
- andmarios 13y agoThanks. Although obvious it totally escaped me. I just reported it. :)