> Arbitrary claims without evidence. Accusations of drinking the kool-aid. Pandering. This is such a frustrating mindset to argue with. Multiple people have al

> Arbitrary claims without evidence. Accusations of drinking the kool-aid. Pandering. This is such a frustrating mindset to argue with. Multiple people have already explained that wikipedia entries are often a very relevant result to return. Just to hammer in the point, a cursory search using Google's keyword tool shows that the term "new computer" has almost 4x the CPC and competitiveness of "computer". The former returns dell as its first organic result. You say that this is just a bad example. Pray, then, what is a good example? If you're going to make outrageous claims, you should support them with evidence. Of course google is optimizing for long term revenue. But the argument that it's sabotaging its other products to create more demand for adwords is an absurd notion.