"... Do you have the rights to do that? ..." I've collected it, stored it. I have the right to 'infer, think, collect, evaluate and express'. So what would yo

"... Do you have the rights to do that? ..." I've collected it, stored it. I have the right to 'infer, think, collect, evaluate and express'. So what would you reckon I license it? "... News.yc has absolutely no terms of service so I presume that you would need to get individual permission from each user to freely license the titles they wrote. ..." Good point. Do you think google get/need permission to extract titles? Do you think companies that trawl the web and re-license search content ask individual permission? I certainly wouldn't like to release any data without some sort of license. What about default to "None (All rights reserved)". But that's an explicitly lame and certainly not about sharing of data. I'm not here to antagonise people here just to supply some data. What do you suggest? The reason i collect the stuff is for personal (not professional) curiosity. The thought behind licensing the data feed I collect was done so that you are free to: A) To Share: to copy, distribute and transmit the work B) To Remix: to adapt the work C) Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). And can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/au/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/au/ The intent is not to restrict but to give attribution, share and remix. It would be good it individual users could choose their license. But at the moment there is none.