3 ms·
Dunno about the author here, but when I looked at MySQL Cluster a while back, it immediately disqualified itself for lacking foreign key support. That's apparen
by nknighthb 13y ago
Dunno about the author here, but when I looked at MySQL Cluster a while back, it immediately disqualified itself for lacking foreign key support. That's apparently been newly added in the last few months, but there's still no shortage of annoying limitations to be had.
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/mysql-cluster-limitations.html http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/mysql-cluster-limitat...
And apparently they require a minimum of six nodes. And the supported installation method is a GUI installer. Sounds like typical "enterprise" Oracle trash, further eroding whatever confidence I might have in it.
- klaruz 13y agoThat's NDB cluster, not Galera. They are apples and oranges.
- nknighthb 13y agoPlease re-read the comment I replied to, which was asking why MySQL Cluster (NDB) would not be considered as an alternative to Galera. Using Galera in production myself, I'm well aware they are different things.